tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24066635.post2715354681387578862..comments2024-02-29T06:03:35.483-05:00Comments on Canada's Anglo-Celtic Connections: Ancestors and AncestryJDRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06471656063812824731noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24066635.post-46691154508370555752008-05-13T22:40:00.000-04:002008-05-13T22:40:00.000-04:00Diane: More women than men are involved in family ...Diane: More women than men are involved in family history. It just makes good commercial sense for publishers to take into account the audience. <BR/>There is no reason why women genealogists could not write about any aspects of the subject. I've not studied the experience. For instance, do men rather than women tend to write about military topics in family history?JDRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06471656063812824731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24066635.post-44604751624068746642008-05-13T12:41:00.000-04:002008-05-13T12:41:00.000-04:00Pardon me? Are you saying, John, that women geneal...Pardon me? Are you saying, John, that women genealogists write more or only about food? Hardly!<BR/><BR/>As an example, I just received the current issue of 'Digital Genealogist'- a U.S. based publication, (Vol 2 # 3) & a quick count of this issue shows 17 authors - 9 men & 8 women - no recipes there and the Editor is a woman. (Of the Editorial Board & regular contributors, it looks like 8 women Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com