Why is it when senior public servants decide to meet over lunch, when not in travel status, taxpayers pick up the tab? Wouldn't they be eating a lunch anyway? Why aren't such lunches a taxable benefit? Here's an example from LAC.
12 December 2010
Proactive Disclosure Questions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
1. "Swizterland" sic. It would be interesting to see the very original expense claim.
2. Why didn't the consultants pick up the tabs?
3. Are "refreshments" on government time at 395 Wellington alcohol free?
4. May I send copies of this post to political parties, my MP, and the media?
Post a Comment